- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
0 T+ K: D& B1 R) D# G0 LBoy Induced by Indirect Topical# f4 p' \7 H* ]
Exposure to Testosterone
# H. K: w4 [8 ?% lSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
. e9 ~/ Z0 E7 U4 @: X1 xand Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1$ I" |6 Z# [+ ^! N( b
Clinical Pediatrics6 [6 a |" @- R$ s- ]
Volume 46 Number 6
% m5 O% f7 J- l0 ^July 2007 540-543- f- Y8 M2 y, z
© 2007 Sage Publications4 R# L4 A ~+ L& b, J8 m1 W
10.1177/0009922806296651' o% k: t- j, E
http://clp.sagepub.com
* _7 g& V; e( d4 s5 Qhosted at' ?; M( ^! o" h) `2 ?+ L
http://online.sagepub.com
1 h1 q$ z7 _) qPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,6 o& d4 E7 e6 X* l0 E( x. H
is a significant concern for physicians. Central
& j' w; z' Z5 Z7 J$ G6 Wprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
& `5 Z4 F" i/ t' Z, m7 }through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
% S! @' v( c1 D( g! B1 a6 u7 C, fa higher incidence of organic central nervous system; q4 O, ^$ u9 u# b/ X
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested/ f3 i$ y. V) p8 n6 n
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
6 H1 o$ r. ~3 g% N9 s; r3 Ohair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-; a! k4 @3 x, K+ y; w
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We7 D( @$ f/ E) K+ j4 L8 X" l D7 v, F* S
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the" |" S7 ?6 ~5 F2 ^+ X3 s) O' M p
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-& `, h. i. [! e7 |3 ]0 y/ R( H, s
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
5 k5 A: g/ i+ jto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by7 X* a1 b6 P o( ~6 D- C5 Q+ c
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-
' r5 b2 ^" E4 y* ]% K; G$ Rmation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
I4 h) S" j7 u0 x3 rchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of: m* G" l B8 |! l
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
K1 h& j$ @( S/ Lbly more common than the rare case report in the+ X5 a1 P; R. D. A6 W
literature.4
6 E: A, a1 I7 z) _: p; n+ f/ cPatient Report/ ]$ n6 C4 L- V+ ]3 G
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the" `. K) P* F' ]1 \4 a8 i
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern$ M! e" e# ~8 K# \+ b, L
of early sexual development. His mother noticed
7 _: n" b5 e, elight colored pubic hair development when he was
- S# n5 D7 N2 O& {8 m# dFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of- ~# |! c6 o$ Y+ ?! ]
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
) e6 M0 ^! w4 \! }8 WAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,* d7 |" n; U/ I: Y# @, {/ |( d
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of* d' B# I% K# V- @; d1 c, \, S
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
p' Z( j5 y- M m+ {. }4 e0 k% ~e-mail: [email protected].4 v4 o R; a3 ?
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
/ K) e q# e; @, N4 zdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-6 q' t9 }0 m6 N2 {. }. U, H# z3 x
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child% H5 z6 e( }4 h0 I( Y
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with& I/ Y6 P% G( I+ @2 S5 C; v
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
+ J1 ^# _. N7 r, s' K" b c20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
# v# i* u3 ^/ n c( [of life and was still receiving breast milk along with
~! G. Z; F7 z4 _0 w+ }solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,, H8 n& [) B4 k
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development; V! Q. T4 X! E0 Q
was age appropriate.7 H2 W' ]- E# i, t3 ^
The family history was remarkable for the father,
* Y& @ t4 r7 k/ Owho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
2 u$ }- A9 j. t. I( w! hwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s# Q7 S N4 U& A3 L' l
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat4 ]( ? F% W# i: }( T
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
% B4 S3 d- W6 gThe father denied taking any other medication. The
4 b/ P9 u7 Q! @' ~child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
- V: ^2 L; B+ T3 @was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet& ]. j( P: \, V* {/ A* P- K1 J
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
- P, M( ]) S0 ~& P! H8 K5 R- mcocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
" u* C4 K6 g- R2 R( ]& o- K2 ]tives. There were no siblings., @& s+ u. d! G* l8 _" {0 x
Physical Examination0 I# D! a: u% A6 O
The physical examination revealed a very active,
# _" ] y( {! D* aplayful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented1 K" q: r# p2 d* p& C# T3 _
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
9 D2 b9 v8 Y. }8 F8 r; p. ?90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg9 p: Q$ b8 L' Z. ~
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth7 L2 ?7 x* ?: b \3 n Q
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of5 b6 ^# Y8 j2 Y: q$ [
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.2 L* g8 u. w9 o, W1 p: }/ @2 e
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
" g! i2 ^- a1 h6 e% N, z$ }- ^enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
+ ^3 u3 W7 J7 V" G% u$ h, a8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
$ v* n' X# G2 Xdeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
1 {3 w5 F. U" i3 L. G( `5 f540
3 G+ G+ T* S4 mat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from& o: Q" v) t- F$ q, O
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The0 l% P) W8 z! v; Y! i
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.. }" K+ C8 V6 `( D+ m
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat/ ^& F; I: ~& l$ P' f, }
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no( C( D( H( q8 m' }; U$ z8 S
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
- S1 l- Z, T$ a: x. kNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+! \6 |) w* f" ?$ ?" p9 k$ r
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
9 `4 {9 G. U5 `: q2 T) {( v$ Zof papilledema.
/ A% `! e; R2 I$ E$ GLaboratory Evaluation
4 o I- z" }' e: U" w' b, @The bone age was consistent with 28 months by: E( z" t0 t3 k2 S
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-2 j' ~0 z/ ?7 l6 X& _: t
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal" @: ?: \& }" Z
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test. w; K0 {+ Y5 g E C$ }3 B6 Z
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
( Q% J9 h% Z1 \. z* j( Ylating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
+ [% H% x4 H2 f2 x) w B: wThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
$ C9 c) }$ K9 l+ gurea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were- C s" z: q. J
within normal range for his age. The concentration
$ L& z: G+ Q& L" r) L2 s$ Vof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
# ]4 ]6 z+ |4 h+ o+ `(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
, j9 C6 r# G7 t3 a( h, png/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
3 O8 }5 h6 `$ I1 `( T( wterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),; a, s. R/ m2 f) H0 Z- \2 N
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to9 m2 K% E/ N X. M' k
49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
1 t" D' a, p; J; E! p2 Cwas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
5 e3 b- O' ]% |tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
( Y' i# ?% A7 o I% N xtestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),' J3 S( y. G8 |# P) v! C
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than3 |6 o$ n& u# ?, R2 m5 `2 g
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
2 g4 O$ t+ c4 I/ A" O( L: }stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone" @- i _; J: M
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
5 W. Z$ z1 P7 S2 H, Z; s7 e(prepubertal).( L2 R6 d( @+ P" ~
The parents were notified about the laboratory
6 ~ B5 Z; Z2 Y. y& p9 P( y! cresults and were informed that all of the tests were. e1 T& U i0 ^
normal except the testosterone level was high. The9 [, E/ |+ p3 u# B! ?& C7 n
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to& u8 i4 C' u& }$ i* G
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
) g- T$ m, U# P: X0 _- iever, the family did not return for 4 months.
; Q2 J* W8 D7 @9 KPhysical examination at this time revealed that the) A. p. Z* z% ]. T4 ]9 O. |8 P: L
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
9 k8 `" h b5 t3 N) `2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
+ t) o0 E7 H& w: D' i" ~unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-9 b' J' z* h6 h% B4 k
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
( |1 o! F3 {% ]0 W* uthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
- [' L, [1 K# u: u# Y0 KmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
1 n/ N, N, y4 h! y. L! i6 F6 C+ ]The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
+ }4 Q/ Q/ B6 ding frequent erections.& m3 {/ j5 S" C; g% H4 `6 {3 L4 ?# F
Both parents were again questioned about use of
* ~# x7 y3 z( many ointment/creams that they may have applied to
, V0 X1 x+ E: \3 uthe child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
7 G# K& U7 u4 ~7 s, h. `) @5 u: ~6 a& \Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
0 ?* S3 I( A1 \6 Suse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
2 y) c0 Z3 m8 ?" Y% R8 j& Ging over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for+ O' {9 D2 h) g, g2 P3 P8 i
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
- w4 L) N# ]" Y6 w- f( a0 d5 P2 eto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
1 K( Y6 l: N4 A) f* x+ {8 F9 }scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
' s! S4 O) t1 T9 b$ Ysecondary to depression.$ T8 @* G5 ?8 D3 I/ [' m
The child slept in the same bed with parents.
* W. \, J9 i# n# S) o9 {The father would hug the baby and hold him on his. f8 A) u, O2 `2 m/ j: i
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
! k+ R' L% w3 {. \3 anificant bare skin contact between baby and father./ i5 p5 N% x @4 E* H
The father also admitted that after the phone call,; L5 _( r* t7 Y' f9 I5 ^; C0 t
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby
- I m% s; r6 lwas high, he then read the product information d, y: C/ K b: m/ T. J' D
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
& ]: r: X/ N' @son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
( {7 r2 Q; S5 o1 L5 adecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
$ h9 y& V9 o. {father was not hugging him with bare skin and had
8 G, O- L( A* w/ J* Ibeen using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone* q: n) Z: }( ]1 F
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the( Z8 K+ t# Z' w) ^0 B+ }9 J# G
laboratory to obtain the test.0 N4 g1 n5 c* i9 G9 ^3 u* x
Discussion
& H5 R9 w2 \% _' W/ z1 rPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
* T8 K1 I6 u6 \; W1 ~sexual development before 9 years of age.1,42 p, j7 ~9 [6 D7 J P& u
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
0 L4 o* z, I/ [, \9 D1 Yit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
- N3 d) c$ W! N1 d: Fthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
- [3 W; J- J# l: I& w2 |! tmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
0 d. N& l$ u9 Lmay have a central nervous system lesion that is
4 w( {5 g" J. C, k+ V9 n6 `) yresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
$ j/ R2 T$ f' C; B4 M2 @amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
3 [' p- P' k$ U' D1 ]$ S8 Ysis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
# U& I# L( Z6 T0 n: u. W* Bboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-, Q3 k4 U* c& E: S. G+ `
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-& N$ P( N4 c( J3 f' f
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by* }3 R8 j: H1 M G4 H$ n. w% n
gonadotropins.1,31 H/ R. l2 H! h4 x$ P
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
2 x; @# K0 `/ ^4 V2 jcious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate, K6 G/ s5 |" N1 I5 u1 m! I v
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
8 w- z, b- Y( m2 k3 Qexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-2 J( c: Y' m( i
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing4 `1 y X9 m+ r" d6 f& [7 J9 B
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
9 Q: p. I" C, i% P% l5 Uadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious+ S$ q/ v" Z. S3 n( w' B8 z A& \& }
puberty in boys.3,45 i" t" E) f! l. H& Y! @; y/ Y2 n
The most common form of congenital adrenal
2 t, `* x! `$ n9 Ihyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
7 H7 X3 ^7 I) nThe 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
& Y, |/ l$ A C; Y* ]4 eexcessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely," c8 I9 _" r3 R; S
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen! H9 f% a! p. C: ^: w9 g4 ]+ e9 F$ v
excess.1,32 S# a" Y4 C+ x- F3 r9 R* {
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
# Q# [& j. _( |# I( H542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
- ^& Y7 o% c- [: }( p+ L5 ?A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-' S* v) h, ?8 v6 q+ y
independent precocious puberty, which is also known1 H: w& ~% E" x
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
; j" M& ^* ?* vvery young age. The physical findings in these boys
2 F+ h: T6 _, |5 x* [$ {( Y twith this disorder are full pubertal development,! J! K0 r2 k5 T) p8 `
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
% g* s2 A# v6 Y0 }! O' P, Uwith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder6 L5 R' ~3 W2 ~' ]
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show& B% M7 V7 J: V6 A
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-0 A/ }3 u) Q4 X- R1 f
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
5 D5 G% S$ r6 {) D; X% Y% mautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
' `' i8 n, c' u) W, m; Zmales; therefore, other male members of the family
3 o! s0 q( m7 w# o- Hmay have similar precocious puberty.3
* p7 {5 r: o4 P) Y$ ZIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
) b$ s9 J% l8 ?, z: r. wsistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
% ~' I1 v0 z+ F5 Xcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis. v. q6 L' E- e
was in the differential diagnosis because his father/ O0 l- }. Y8 X9 B0 h
started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
7 `4 Z6 k. T8 l2 k) }testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
: K9 ~! E' r) S3 o7 e. Z, s1 B+ Vbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
3 G m# H- Q/ p1 L1 B3 U: }ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
3 r; k* V9 }5 b$ Obiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
4 d* Y4 c$ E E7 M/ b0 u& [either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase
: x4 e) \& a" E8 E! cdeficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
5 k! v& L0 V+ j' t* u. Oing the normal level of adrenal steroids.8 ~ _/ q: K" P# c. B- B
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
# G; b" {3 |. U7 Z* o8 `; Z- `, o) Fsuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because, c9 p* ]+ b. E6 W- B+ r
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
8 }. ~/ l. @2 u+ r* |pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
( {6 V Q8 F, h" L; }decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-- h- ~, O9 D& {7 M }4 d
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was: j3 R$ a1 U; M' f4 J) n
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
6 N7 j' g' b2 o/ w: D( u8 y' T% U% L7 XDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or/ n5 |* e% f( Y* f$ O" u3 s; ]0 N/ f
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
- \$ U+ w, O5 Y/ ]& i& Hunprotected females through direct skin exposure.
* H! Y4 c2 ] Y: Q4 h. _& ZSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the1 \/ l$ h+ B! O+ G
baseline value in those females who were exposed to( Q0 i9 k ]$ Y5 T( ~4 @! y
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male6 U9 P+ F4 }! D0 O/ }+ v0 _4 B
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
6 F0 B) b ?; f7 g& ltion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
# f; i$ Z" i- Q1 _9 F, x2 mOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
# [1 K. H; [0 w/ ]: @" Jwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
; c7 i; W* x& ~, N& W1 b& rdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
+ P$ n1 i1 c$ R$ r7 O5 tterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more5 B0 t5 Z9 Y/ w- n' N
active in young children exposed to testosterone0 D* U! L9 Y& ^7 x( \
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-0 X& V' u! e6 w% o, b, h
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
+ z3 T# F2 D, x& ?1 Mvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in$ u" k/ F% Q6 Q# h t" K1 w9 B
children results in an increase in growth velocity and. y5 \0 R$ ]' p5 o
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.. o" @8 w# }. L+ M* C
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during
9 q9 k+ z8 l) t& B8 @early childhood on pubertal development and final/ ~5 i" O/ @5 W* q
adult height are not fully known and always remain
a, c5 T# e9 e7 ea concern. Children treated with short-term testos-9 X9 d M2 ^* E+ P1 y8 c0 h V
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
9 @8 J1 w* X( B- \) ?5 Sacceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
1 M) ]0 h& ]! i& Y8 C0 [0 a4 q* Gcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation3 X/ ~3 ^3 | X2 j9 X7 |
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
6 I' T9 ~' Q' lThere are conflicting reports and controversy! ^* @" h P# [5 H
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult* Q$ a5 s8 X7 x7 D4 Q# {6 a( w
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal+ C, b) {( k% }- H* n8 a
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
: J6 Y3 z2 P4 b" [: h+ g q1 ~1 r) E- Sulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
5 R/ v) q( q1 K$ `% a# USutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between$ w& |9 F1 e8 l, R, F; v7 e- A
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
; n8 s# v- e4 w9 S' A' Zpenile length in clinical studies.8 f/ X, R5 B. \3 y- M) ]8 J3 M
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
# l k$ c& `5 I' o6 P; i! Rgoing to experience any of the untoward effects from
+ N8 u( a7 s v' W+ [testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
% O5 W- Y% J- h" [the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
$ q) I/ f5 H7 Z! [5 O3 t5 pAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of" ^! A1 u! m! w( j0 I! ?0 \
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
- Q: @) Z V: p' L' d' \8 [$ A, Ethe follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
! ?6 ^! h/ T3 mheight will not be affected.9 F& ^0 ^7 i [7 z( i, @; h4 t, _
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-* I$ s0 c* p; p# e
ability of androgen products in our society may
. C+ V' A" v) L0 gindeed cause more virilization in male or female
: X3 Z, b# v) U* Ochildren than one would realize. Exposure to andro-5 \# l4 @' ]* S X g' @
gen products must be considered and specific ques-9 L o0 v2 ^+ q9 g& d, Q
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or& g* P2 e7 K' T9 n3 m; ~ y
gel should be asked of the family members during
$ l7 h% i: N$ x$ H. `" d! Ythe evaluation of any children who present with vir-
) o; K. n" b- K2 O4 n7 ?9 g* T% Gilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-& ~# ^0 W; l! J& V9 H1 n9 t4 u; L
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by0 A1 {# M' f5 e/ h( f9 T. b5 ]
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a) j/ }6 Z! D6 Z+ d
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may6 s9 O% {8 b) R/ ]" q
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive2 r, j* H0 e, r0 {. n: U' a
investigation. The primary care physician should be1 X: v. B0 ]2 e" L; E6 N6 F
aware of this fact, because most of these children5 {1 y' i6 y0 O- S* K$ V; v& g. g
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’, X Z/ }0 b* a
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a. v0 j- }" x8 o* E
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
0 P4 j4 e0 E W3 k9 Nfemale child who might come in contact with some-& s, Y- g& U$ J, }9 ]; s! B w
one using any of these products.
. B, K4 G6 R! {+ B" IReferences& w3 M2 w( e- b
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation5 y/ ?1 Q6 J2 d1 \- v) ^
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric! |* z4 @- v% E% W% H
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
% p% N. E8 o+ f5 E4 I0 f2002: 565-628./ P o, \* Q! V. z
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
/ B. U+ H# q! c% K6 J4 ]! A4 Kpuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|