- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
is a significant concern for physicians. Central
8 c* r* d/ O! S$ x/ [; Hprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
" T8 ?6 g# y5 ^( U3 Mthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has; u8 s( Y1 B% ?
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
' O" M( c" k" a/ ?2 \; L# Llesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested+ g. Z" w, t6 _/ Z/ @2 r$ L
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
8 f" [8 L, Y \( s2 k$ Ehair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-7 S2 y" M" i7 H `3 _
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
. ~* d- R: _( Z4 rreport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the; R0 k5 h9 S# m" w
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-6 p2 }% y% t7 \! |9 u1 `% f$ Q- {
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
7 P% t c. T6 v) N$ @/ G7 Gto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by3 N4 l u; A% a) r: U) D
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-
" e6 o' p# R" [3 c9 Nmation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
" G t7 }( l' j& @child. Given the widespread and easy availability of
6 I& [' [$ I$ F! c1 Ztestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-0 V+ l. d! s0 f2 u4 A( I8 f0 l4 v/ [
bly more common than the rare case report in the
8 ^6 l3 D6 o; Lliterature.4& I0 [# b* Q- y% f
Patient Report0 `5 ~* n$ K4 p; E8 @
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the- T P; ~9 c5 _* A$ b% X5 [- R6 @
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
8 f7 ~& q: g: u: g$ qof early sexual development. His mother noticed
, W$ p0 K Y8 J" D6 slight colored pubic hair development when he was
4 D+ L% `( d* N- N f3 RFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of0 o* B- c0 i0 A5 B' G; w
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
% s4 {+ ~2 u8 `7 h5 K, N" SAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,8 g# y% ]9 M8 R7 Y
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
2 D2 @+ L& N5 n& p2 }7 o& Y5 |# UMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
0 o6 c& F$ w- a4 g. Z$ _: G+ q$ c" K3 }e-mail: [email protected].) X" {' c1 c, E! q1 v; X. U
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
$ t, h8 d! ^1 v9 ?1 X. edarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-3 D: j2 F) x6 y- n8 V
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
, Q& M8 w0 A, ^; G5 nwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
# c5 A1 Z( P0 V da birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of7 L! j* P# x: j
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year' ^4 O E! D% ^ Y0 e( e; I! D7 O
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with) h+ Z. B& O |
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,8 Q! Q8 b8 P" n, G
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
) I. ^7 n! Q q7 r' nwas age appropriate.+ B! L0 @ J* w2 p
The family history was remarkable for the father,
1 p( A: H% b% v: m7 H2 nwho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,$ | G! {9 V0 d5 D6 U
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s% B' K1 |# M) y: d& K- f U
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
5 S: n4 ]7 x' U8 t1 ?* S5 Kearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14. _' q8 I0 m! u1 o5 @, X5 O# B
The father denied taking any other medication. The5 k" h6 ^: D1 ]# v' c
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
3 N6 F" f7 L# g3 Lwas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet" {$ \0 d7 N3 C( E6 j
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-2 m# e: M3 A; T5 [
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-2 S; i; i8 T' y% @8 [, a
tives. There were no siblings.
- U: ]- ?0 c$ k$ U' }& cPhysical Examination
" a: o6 z( b2 q& {- i2 hThe physical examination revealed a very active,' Y; M; Z2 ~: H9 T( }0 \ d- B
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented+ C0 z M% }! P' Y. D
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
( Z9 G- M4 o6 I* t0 ^% ]( r90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg& G, Y N* C' s3 s8 |( }
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
1 x2 k) f& f$ m0 L( T% Q( gvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
7 z4 F4 y7 P- |. Wthe neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.& e; b: x* {* v @- W1 S
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
6 J7 |7 m4 T$ R; U* ^$ M% K, y- Benlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
) V, m: _+ n1 a8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well4 H' U: E' Z! \1 B9 q! z
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
; l- }+ H" ~. E9 u4 ^! `7 B, Y540# ]" O% g, p5 I! g6 x" J
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from2 S. } G" L6 f4 m6 k, U
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The2 H2 i& b# M2 |. t9 t# T
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.5 z! m w2 i, D( [) `4 C
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
6 Q n3 g2 ~: r; G# doily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
' l g5 \8 Z" f8 I+ N2 l! f# oabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.3 f0 q2 f- Y9 b
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
; X; M3 F& k: M: v1 Gbilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
4 C" A' i: L/ ` S" U8 gof papilledema.% M$ U3 F3 M+ r' J
Laboratory Evaluation
/ B1 P, p8 h1 b: hThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by/ x+ G, o5 u5 L% c. @
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
. R; }3 I1 `6 D* k: d5 h+ G# z" L5 c4 clogic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
7 N7 j8 v; [, U# B- c+ F% Akaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test1 F- f0 j0 z& N5 m" F/ d' L
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-1 E* L$ @' i- t& j+ i8 l
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
. K" j" A1 j3 R6 A% bThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood: P" d+ p* ?( }/ J9 w
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were$ N4 s6 s: u& U5 o+ r4 d
within normal range for his age. The concentration
6 e. T/ c- C$ V% `. G7 I" Z8 Z& Aof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL) Y% U5 f+ p6 U2 {
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 201 j2 l# n" {, M+ s& h, X+ P
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-( Z! P1 t- ]- p( ?
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),1 b+ C& J! }* D$ b! ?
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to8 o7 |9 v% L7 b( C- s
49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)! x% j' g! P0 X' s( B
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
! k5 T' B0 W, z8 Xtisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
1 z( W, d8 T; K0 |: [! Y( rtestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
# r0 E( p) x, U4 n5 e7 X! S( _and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
. b4 h- s {4 g1 ]0 F6 j$ u5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular( l$ _ J$ s8 Q, S9 M1 a
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
6 M# n' a# F3 @. \concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL) \! t `7 i. L
(prepubertal).
, @/ o5 }' h D4 h& V& IThe parents were notified about the laboratory) n( H3 O- ^" x# ?" v; Y9 d0 D
results and were informed that all of the tests were+ }! P* |- c3 z3 N c% z( ]
normal except the testosterone level was high. The6 {# K& A9 H- y& z+ M
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
! E. Q# F* X* b0 K6 ~ P, W8 K( ]obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how- t" ^% a0 u; B+ N D- ^# ?
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
Z! {+ a# U8 j n; ePhysical examination at this time revealed that the
+ `, V/ f0 v+ Tchild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained3 K8 K C+ L* h3 p. Z5 ?/ |
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained( }. p+ Q3 e$ m- D% V
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
2 r' K! X% j' p* ? Ipletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at" Z, H' K9 S1 M5 p* v
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2! [' r1 n. ^: D( ^/ H0 g
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
0 P% r$ t; ?2 uThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
6 g5 \. I8 }8 F" fing frequent erections.
' x5 D2 |3 z/ F9 e1 |Both parents were again questioned about use of# J9 r& E) _' \. `% B
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to: B- a$ r' X6 |! b: q
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the+ H9 W1 ]% w* |& b
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 5413 }+ R6 Y$ Q* i9 R
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
3 V/ _4 m) n: j" A) j0 A3 ming over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for3 r" d2 s% \; }5 I) Q' Y7 H5 b
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
7 p3 o- a- D" | K! r% C7 ]) Mto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
2 k; u/ c! U& c& O3 a' {7 zscribed by his family physician for decreased libido- a0 d6 W+ D6 W4 ]( t
secondary to depression.
: H* I# n* j8 _ ]" Z. A) \The child slept in the same bed with parents.; F9 X1 A- E0 A1 t
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his
; n, w7 h4 X# m5 a, J) s) tchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
, z8 B% h6 \ d0 Jnificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
4 _9 o$ V- Y& R; ~The father also admitted that after the phone call,
; z) g6 I& b8 }when he learned the testosterone level in the baby
5 }8 S# C8 F+ I# s" _0 G2 Ewas high, he then read the product information4 D9 f6 b& B+ J! E3 \) W2 I
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
/ {+ y7 A J$ C/ ?) |9 ison for the child’s virilization. At that time, they/ n r, R) v- e3 y( o( q
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
7 I! E) f) ?! v( X1 ?; ~father was not hugging him with bare skin and had# u& ~6 b" {) ]1 }, r7 F Z
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
) S( Q- m+ R9 o# o# ]2 x2 J Z+ ]test was ordered, but the family did not go to the2 A1 b" c1 K/ @
laboratory to obtain the test.
+ K* L& V+ O+ g$ c& zDiscussion+ W( a3 B5 R+ i' X7 ?( ? k
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
1 M- b: e' m6 p$ W6 n% _* v" `sexual development before 9 years of age.1,49 Q6 N: X/ y4 D' ?" c/ A6 X& z
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when' h% S4 Q% F. [8 p: ~# q) ]; p) S+ I) h
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-# |/ U+ i9 N+ R! o9 r
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
6 C5 ^$ }) ~& J) Smon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
8 p4 Y8 q( T. Jmay have a central nervous system lesion that is0 V7 K$ K8 \4 @* ~4 x
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
7 ~8 D; M4 Y! B/ ^" t$ ?amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
. d) S$ U7 T' [+ Zsis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
5 O+ R* h" I2 w* gboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
6 Q8 F4 @. X) sization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
@0 |4 f6 [8 M9 X7 }rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
7 t0 l3 }% |6 n' l8 F9 H! Igonadotropins.1,36 c$ o' X! c, J) t) Y: F
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
/ q9 g6 [4 R \; i( J+ Icious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
' L! W1 R8 t- Y! B. bandrogenic stimulation from either endogenous or9 \6 N% D: v( ~2 f [* d4 p
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-+ ?( a3 z) T# F
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
~7 R% w$ n5 s) v: \congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
# b1 e! R. g* T- [adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
3 E- z: I& _, s- [' Z/ _0 i$ dpuberty in boys.3,4; M6 O W, e) Z) V/ E& R, j
The most common form of congenital adrenal
: L' l" r( p, S2 G4 ~hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.; B. \% @# W7 v- E
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in' d! o1 t. k# H& Z1 X; W
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
6 d2 ^+ r# c7 \3 H' W0 {* f6 u& ?, r# gan adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
1 S' o& ?; G* Cexcess.1,3
* W, |1 @5 @4 x: ~; [ ^( o- i, _at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from, l: [. ~( Z8 n: a3 D2 O$ L
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 20074 k1 P { R' e9 U+ p9 m
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-2 A4 t0 ^- q* K) } z6 r
independent precocious puberty, which is also known
l* X. P7 n( E$ k/ I6 [ |as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
' X" V5 K- k# I" a ivery young age. The physical findings in these boys5 z+ ^7 p3 {' @8 {
with this disorder are full pubertal development,1 p$ |" p0 I9 B! k/ v- [
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
: e: y6 ^4 n! Mwith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
" L7 P9 T9 p t) Z7 P- ^are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
% }2 ?) _# E8 d O# L+ l# a2 Npubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
4 ?; w. J6 o" V! hreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked0 r& j+ \2 I% N3 {) [
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only8 p. l( N6 ^/ f4 k: i- N
males; therefore, other male members of the family: y& C( Z% j4 h4 O& x, J
may have similar precocious puberty.3- [$ D( j, I1 W. _
In our patient, physical examination was incon-
8 h3 Q9 U$ @$ d. A/ f$ Zsistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
8 s$ h- x) n1 S5 p7 n' D# s2 Pcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
+ R9 S x" h9 X( wwas in the differential diagnosis because his father
# y) m* k, b! P2 w) Gstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
" {7 _1 f1 ^; M. etesticular enlargement is not that evident in the
( o! e7 V I, Tbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-2 O6 K' o- p O0 P- g
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
" N- u. B' \" m: f- ]biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,, p6 _" Q" Q( h7 o
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase l. x% k8 _2 l* F' W
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
! v+ V5 Z. E$ B3 g( |3 ging the normal level of adrenal steroids.
4 z& P1 |/ y/ ]. p9 P7 D" tThe diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly! V2 h# |( R' [6 z2 X! D; p
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
) v* ` k) m* wthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-0 W% A! e1 u: V3 ]- R: U
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and* ^4 N0 y3 U) F( Q
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
+ K0 T7 i# p, S) ~6 Z7 ?) S0 |' Sterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
) U5 }1 @) v7 Susing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
7 f. Q3 l% l: d. bDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
7 J- c0 d+ K" M! }5 P5 m) u9 G1 tcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to* E, h, K5 g1 U+ n8 d7 i& a# H3 D/ w
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.
& E9 o- p5 _$ q9 USerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the0 D6 c6 Z I' h; h+ M) Z
baseline value in those females who were exposed to
/ Q3 `7 G; F) q: d/ m' heven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male9 }, @( n: t r0 b0 }7 ^
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-1 @2 Q- P! ]! B9 ^) z; r% }" D" Y
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
+ f# a% ~& m( `. a9 J1 V8 G( y1 yOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
) ?. n& t+ B- ~) B9 T' p2 k& D$ t' ]+ kwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
# D3 ?7 O2 D% r, ?% Jdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
( Q& o6 y6 A2 w: `, E# Aterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
! O) {4 r1 g! j% g$ N0 jactive in young children exposed to testosterone
7 L* f/ N# N! G) W6 F6 fexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-, j8 X7 U6 c0 C2 I( m* M0 y) a
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to# W. R- X, R! k
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in" P. V% b+ t/ L/ T1 z- J
children results in an increase in growth velocity and
E; n7 b& L1 U @- `advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
; e8 N3 u( L1 D8 k) ?The long-term effect of androgen exposure during* t) ~. E& K* R. S& [0 \
early childhood on pubertal development and final" i) T2 s2 s Y \6 Y2 O4 H0 V
adult height are not fully known and always remain2 W# \. T2 H' w# P6 w
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-2 b/ T* Z, L7 o8 P! b* y# F. A
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
; [' H' V, {* F0 o4 m$ }. facceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
. f+ u' }! [6 U. B5 ccessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation- U7 o Q9 r/ ]5 L
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9- E1 W4 u; q$ b5 d$ ?
There are conflicting reports and controversy- B0 e% h; b6 _9 p$ ], X! N
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
; Q5 ?+ v, U* O9 d8 W+ mpenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
b3 n# Q1 a+ r. K" o9 nadult penile length, apparently because of downreg-$ A6 M' A8 t* n- I
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,( D5 f' j! [& b2 k* D
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
6 p* a0 f6 g" |4 schildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult' F$ h+ H9 u8 f: `6 Z8 R0 L
penile length in clinical studies.- g$ @% M( M: V, x
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is* ?! T' X# a' Q2 |* X. L
going to experience any of the untoward effects from$ P1 J* K6 [: n$ I1 [ C
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
3 N1 L0 ~. T4 ?" |2 tthe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
6 e( ^/ s" I x/ A# U0 AAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of9 G4 r' d* Y( n6 J' |/ u2 P
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at4 C! X- a6 M3 H0 N) l7 I& t+ `
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
! Z# p; ?4 r+ d+ B( Sheight will not be affected.5 \8 x# @5 D% s
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-
- j: G; H- c5 s/ [+ y9 \9 F5 R# J, Cability of androgen products in our society may
& A6 T4 J1 @% D g7 z& Jindeed cause more virilization in male or female0 ? @+ e' |( b5 v
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
/ y& P- m1 `% F( F; P9 ]) Egen products must be considered and specific ques-
- E8 V( h/ y6 r6 h$ n+ ntioning about the use of a testosterone product or
) s' o' ]' w$ E; }2 xgel should be asked of the family members during
! L" ` y8 B' d9 Y1 J6 qthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-
* |9 k2 Q* e$ p% s) M" ^' Rilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-$ k( ?+ n$ B! b+ N8 S5 q
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
3 U/ g$ b# I8 U) @4 c- T2 }appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
" x; w. B9 C1 }( T8 i1 ghistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
' P% R' _. V6 E+ @. P& p$ Q) ~! D9 z& cresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive% x' X0 `! C' M* t* R, r# r8 d
investigation. The primary care physician should be
1 S& C" f6 J, i) M) T. W7 {% gaware of this fact, because most of these children
B7 |3 j5 j% jmay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’. R% E; H; j1 J7 F; Q: T
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a4 C& d" c F* f- R
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
3 M8 C1 B! t8 T7 b2 F# v) ufemale child who might come in contact with some-8 e2 F' f: R$ A
one using any of these products.
8 X, p3 {$ O+ F& ]+ h/ Q: |$ \References9 a" M/ g7 u2 X# @; R
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
) H7 ?+ h" J% V9 [' v1 dand puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
( }* ]" I! X7 ^0 X% F- j; ]# z2 z* kEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;4 l9 g; A; X) J- f4 B# q
2002: 565-628.& |7 S4 c3 l& R F6 U( x
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious: A7 @% \4 P3 I" h! h
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal
8 q$ c o( F- {2 xat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
. w, ?. }# F1 P9 @4 k2 F$ X9 L8 a- xTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 5431 F" Y6 L J; A+ C8 k; e" F+ |
areas: organic central precocious puberty. Acta Paediatr.0 y0 }0 m0 T7 Q& L0 Z
2001;90:751-756.
3 J. v% r$ E$ H+ ]3. Lee PA. Puberty and its disorders. In: Lifshitz F, ed.
( @; z. f& }, G7 d K- A$ v. aPediatric Endocrinology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Marcel
5 [: p" j( p1 ^0 K0 j6 iDekker Inc; 2003:211-238. a- `# o2 ]4 Y9 j' k
4. Yu YM, Punyasavatsu N, Elder D, D’Ercole AJ. Sexual
1 O; _* r& h: Idevelopment in a two-year-old boy induced by topical
2 b F: f7 ]: V0 Lexposure to testosterone. Pediatrics. 1999;104:e23.! }* @, o: Z/ B2 d6 ]7 ~* H
5. Greulich WW, Pyle SI, eds. Radiographic Atlas of
% ?1 ~$ E8 X6 FSkeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist. 2nd ed.
: |. Y" L7 z8 L1 R5 [ P- Y( ]Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1959.2 [" w- S) g: u* J
6. Physicians’ Desk Reference. Androgel 1% testosterone,
, i6 W3 d& G8 [+ a1 q* l5 VUnimed Pharmaceutical Inc. Montvale, NJ: Medical5 G: X6 x, ?" p3 t4 c; Z0 F' |4 a
Economics Company, Inc; 2004:3239-3241.2 L& o K/ K! @- k) [
7. Klugo RC, Cerny JC. Response of micropenis to topical( a9 N& E1 I: O; o
testosterone and gonadotropin. J Urol. 1978;119:
: M, T8 ?1 k+ ]: K667-668.
. B/ F( \+ d% }% f, \" a8. Guthrie RD, Smith DW, Graham CB. Testosterone
) I0 ^! r: j5 @! d0 Wtreatment for micropenis during early childhood. J Pediatr.
% I. q* e5 @# W1973;83:247-252.
* P9 q" x$ Q# X; C4 j% ~9. Jacobs SC, Kaplan GW, Gittes RF. Topical testosterone' w. @& j1 e. w! ?% ?, P2 ]
therapy for penile growth. Urol. 1975;6:708-710.
- s1 m0 N) J5 b, o% y10. Husmann DA, Cain MP. Microphallus: eventual phallic2 t8 r0 m& s4 [6 q$ g1 w
size is dependent on the timing of androgen administra-/ Z# m2 p. F7 J5 N) O5 A
tion. J Urol. 1994;152:734-739.
; L% `6 t Y! u. i, I4 u+ U11. McMahon DR, Kramer SA, Husmann DA. Micropenis:
8 s: c: m3 u; Q) X! v& ?does early treatment with testosterone do more harm% M; L, ?! v. H4 p8 o+ w' @
than good? J Urol. 1995;154:825-829.
/ a* W9 \) ]! X8 ]# Y7 v+ w3 @12. Takane KK, George FW, Wilson JD. Androgen receptor
+ h6 P- b. a+ E& S# u! Nof rat penis is down-regulated by androgen. Am J Physiol.9 }4 c5 {% U8 x4 w* a; l# T5 D6 u2 K
1990;258:E46-E50.1 x1 k8 G' O& s2 w1 T4 {. B: E
13. Sutherland RS, Kogan BA, Baskin LS, et al. The effect
7 P, K a% T# x+ h, L3 ^, e! Aof prepubertal androgen exposure on adult penile
2 c3 a% E+ l) n k5 t V y+ [length. J Urol. 1996;156:783-787. |
|