- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
is a significant concern for physicians. Central; A+ m: n7 J1 F5 S6 [
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated& c$ t: ^( \& P- S, ~
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has5 \0 S9 k) b7 K8 x0 j* V
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system$ g2 p8 b, m u9 I r1 ^
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
4 ~/ y2 s. I; f8 \* g3 Wby enlargement of the penis, development of pubic" @6 ?8 V3 z; L4 k/ ~+ h
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
* j7 R8 K' Y+ v- i; P0 xcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We% o' e5 L- E' `+ y
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the, s8 s/ f8 g7 R0 o
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-! ^7 B' \4 r& T k. @% @& t8 |
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
& z& a; X6 e: J% [to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by7 [ u* \1 q+ \2 C. F
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-
+ a4 V& }0 P! T7 }0 q' w8 imation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this9 |, Q6 U" `+ ]/ y2 b. s
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of
9 }7 [: u2 u/ C, @9 S$ x8 q( ttestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-4 t! B/ n* \2 v" o/ P
bly more common than the rare case report in the J& v5 H# e* `
literature.40 a& F/ z+ d' @1 O7 r! x- h
Patient Report
" H2 W/ S; W9 ^A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
) K2 F* M, ?$ `3 @6 n$ T" lendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
1 t6 C* C' U9 ~: Uof early sexual development. His mother noticed. f5 u' g; K! A& B& Y
light colored pubic hair development when he was+ Z9 l8 Z% r" @* N) A) z
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
2 z- l% W& W2 h& DSouth Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.3 d' b) A1 A/ h- `
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
% {2 ^2 H1 a2 _4 j$ q6 ~! F7 mProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
( M2 N& l, G/ h+ o6 X' fMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;7 i2 r& I# ~6 ~% N& O5 ]
e-mail: [email protected].. ]9 i0 k, x$ D4 |) x Z; v
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became( ^" {8 d. L; _) z1 ^! t9 h
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
; y/ P( E1 c% |% F3 w# ]# W" tment of his penis and frequent erections. The child9 Q$ ^, X5 U" R; t
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
4 C& y; Y/ V1 J( `) Pa birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of' R3 j( l! O w. o+ ^
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year1 p* Q9 b5 M' O X% X
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with
4 x7 J+ p& [& z7 j& xsolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,7 K& q( e V; [2 D4 Q" @" t1 I
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
3 F% k1 p" [4 P& _9 Lwas age appropriate.
& @) e; A5 ?+ fThe family history was remarkable for the father,
# C8 V3 w- J. }; [who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
0 ]1 \) j7 k. D$ N$ U& r/ dwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s! W3 d5 X0 S; M! e$ z
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
/ }$ t2 P4 ^5 Y0 jearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
2 u2 K& S) d( u4 L! _3 RThe father denied taking any other medication. The/ x5 l& O. j) K8 p% o: V$ i1 o
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche5 C' @1 S& E' Z# g8 X
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
2 B* D1 A3 i1 ?- K- x8 W0 w5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-2 t) q) o( R) x! j8 G: v) b" L
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
) m P; Z7 ?4 z: ctives. There were no siblings.) X1 D+ d/ c* Z6 u1 }6 h
Physical Examination9 _& P P) a: e+ A# y, U
The physical examination revealed a very active,
/ H7 s8 g( Y0 b5 @ w8 V) G _playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented' [7 ^$ D( |$ c' q4 S0 Q
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
7 z+ h5 Q1 S M90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
7 E$ r; Z+ I. z2 B& j2 g(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth- ]& e- X/ y/ R6 ~+ }' P* F
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
2 n" o* v& _, u6 Tthe neck revealed no thyroid enlargement." K$ l- o. S* [9 a
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for: K/ S- ~4 F6 t
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of% a6 b; m2 C! }; S
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well% ^0 R ~+ x' F# l) [3 ]
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
0 n, t4 s6 ~; H( `3 X0 i5404 ~, h8 U4 `& \6 ~
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from; n% F4 m- \; F4 z2 c1 y
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The9 J! U7 G% J$ k4 l1 m [
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.3 n A# M+ _" ~! K; y
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
2 ?% _( Y# i% u2 U! J1 s0 ]oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
( r5 c4 v9 ~1 r# D; Sabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
/ b/ T/ e4 M3 n; a0 }Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
, r/ ?5 ~6 C: u- R. Sbilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion. v8 o5 s7 F3 d c: q7 V+ ?& s
of papilledema.
9 l' J" V' J1 F+ CLaboratory Evaluation
% {8 n: t; j- M% mThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by( y' i( n6 c% B$ s* }4 @$ `
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
5 Z5 ~6 ^+ F/ v3 h# @/ J' o) Hlogic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
' l; U0 c5 C* N4 x T' Tkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
: l3 T% k' T& i, c& Lshowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-* O+ w4 X9 I( Y. W* U, f% n9 J$ v) d
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).3 n( R. u! d. S; A3 s
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood+ x- ^4 Q% S0 U
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
! L" n% m: h. X8 H* h" ewithin normal range for his age. The concentration; R/ b+ K- u; ?
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
# n& ]9 j0 }, O: y4 y: V5 k(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20" ?# a% a0 K2 [3 }& {
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-! l; E( V5 d2 [3 ]/ W. K4 v# l
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
5 P. S$ s( u! ?1 V% a6 ^/ cdesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
( j H* { t" w X4 L49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S); s D7 N0 T! q0 r5 o4 ^
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
( m7 n4 [" B4 X. f' z9 ?- U( V4 @tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total$ P$ h% e0 N2 \0 x7 G1 o
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),3 K6 [. d/ t) I Y6 I7 K1 h
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than% b( F# g/ Y& Q
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular' Z4 P/ R3 s t _+ Y: q& }
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone+ t6 M. x# [; a [
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
0 `+ u6 j/ U) Q2 x(prepubertal).7 C( t' f. S: ?( P' h7 H
The parents were notified about the laboratory% m8 c }- r4 J
results and were informed that all of the tests were
* Z4 ~& T2 |. w' H" ~$ {( G% anormal except the testosterone level was high. The
- n# i {" s, D, a q" rfollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
. A- H* x% s, N; j2 D" r+ vobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
0 Y) {) }& b# H G3 @ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
! p9 X" l9 q3 G' f% |/ s5 aPhysical examination at this time revealed that the
# I) M0 T j9 A% F3 {- O) pchild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained. E, R9 D1 n; o V1 D" H
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained3 o" h( \ N ^
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-* P0 k5 V v1 r7 X/ l' S; n
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at, J& U" F+ s2 _) g, C- w- q
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 27 Z5 `& v s. q$ v
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.3 F+ ^) b' t/ Y# u% f' z
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-0 P, ]5 O" l* t' O+ b
ing frequent erections.+ t4 c. D) a5 I0 Y" v' v+ X
Both parents were again questioned about use of2 R5 m- R% Q6 V$ i' S u: X; D. r
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to
& V' |. K! P/ d" Vthe child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
5 Z) ~+ H4 C3 i$ k6 k, b& ITopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541+ k5 Y1 q1 u9 Y8 u3 {+ I& a5 x3 G
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-! p( r0 C) i. `6 \8 L' z0 R
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
; U! f/ _) I6 B& g. y8 ta year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
2 }% D* R3 S# M8 I( G6 Gto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-: m+ g' `; v4 h4 ?7 E
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
q8 \! t1 A' usecondary to depression.
1 ?6 @: m$ [( I. [. X' uThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
: h+ p* E9 |* w' JThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his
9 S5 u* r" L$ ^& }4 ~chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
2 q0 S9 ^9 w3 o" pnificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
8 l/ w6 }$ ^; q* h' p* q$ dThe father also admitted that after the phone call,0 y& ?0 p+ e# f0 f) {1 q' B% ]4 u
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby# Z2 c5 ~ m7 a& r! t' t
was high, he then read the product information
* G6 j9 E: a* E8 X, g, vpacket and concluded that it was most likely the rea-2 W" ?' ]3 u0 o) H5 h6 {" F
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they' J ~4 |" ?7 N5 X, ^3 g
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the& |3 D% x! f7 z3 g# `" x9 D
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had
" D$ o0 z, H( I, `* H# C( N) ibeen using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone) M$ ]! Q ~8 D+ L$ F4 e
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the$ ]& k2 o0 W1 j
laboratory to obtain the test." [6 Y/ l+ ?& I* b
Discussion
! \& C) W* d. V2 M! ^Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
4 L4 N! P) Q; O2 Ksexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
8 K$ b1 p1 R5 Y( M3 @ D7 DPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when1 U( |8 t9 w' A o5 D
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
/ ]2 z( H7 X) r( t @% hthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-9 y) d7 R O1 O* B
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
' ^) ]3 u2 a. u& amay have a central nervous system lesion that is, e! k2 v; p6 v) k& |: I; X9 d
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
/ O8 T9 N; o/ L1 N$ m7 Q' jamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-4 T. i5 F+ o4 Z1 }0 [. x- e
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
4 y9 c, p- p0 V5 Vboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
# t$ W6 V: g( {ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
5 L E. m0 Y3 O2 S& j: s# r3 Srical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
) y% q6 _- y6 |0 k/ f2 ^# E- R! V7 Fgonadotropins.1,30 ^2 h; y- r9 ~0 l L0 f* y1 n$ q
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
' n) o) \, Z- i- W% `/ F, `$ v, Acious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate d0 I2 d. G* k' N
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
+ J' \$ R) a! |# bexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
/ M) D5 K# `8 w* y9 A, o( `ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
T; m4 q U; {) w3 u; S4 fcongenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
8 B6 T5 J! n- @7 |- t ~5 badrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious" G4 K3 l4 j+ Z( h: G
puberty in boys.3,47 N* `: i3 D3 J/ d/ o: Y
The most common form of congenital adrenal
3 I( | [$ t( Qhyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency. B; g1 |7 x7 F6 J$ E
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
/ t- P% H j9 J. I) N, }: |* Pexcessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
$ D& R9 j$ |" u+ m2 @9 \an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
$ L# ~$ a' O% g# S- Q oexcess.1,3" l1 N" D# a c" a/ j) b' ?0 W4 D
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
1 A& f+ y, W& C542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007' o5 Y2 X! `( A
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
4 |+ f+ E8 @* @( G J0 rindependent precocious puberty, which is also known
: H U0 H* R( ^7 D6 Oas testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a H/ b$ W6 O. G( Y
very young age. The physical findings in these boys
" _" P1 {) S8 Ewith this disorder are full pubertal development,# T2 _2 I! U$ x, I! Y# Z
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys( M3 g' R! i, @" w' r9 W) y1 Y
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
, f; B: P, E, b& dare suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show, [4 s% v4 N- X8 Z+ ^
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
( d6 Z; _' h3 g; G+ h0 preleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked. O/ A4 K& T6 S
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only% K* ]) z0 M8 P% O/ K' A0 l6 [: s
males; therefore, other male members of the family
+ b2 e- X- R7 w1 {1 w7 Xmay have similar precocious puberty.3
! v8 D9 F6 ~. |& Y9 VIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
$ l* l; K7 t Z6 o/ ~sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-7 _% \3 f) Y# J6 \
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
/ z& o: l4 Y% V) nwas in the differential diagnosis because his father5 i4 k5 b F X
started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
" _4 h) i) b& L& y9 h8 ]. ~, ]testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
$ c! m0 R+ F+ d3 mbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
0 P6 K& h1 A% r7 ^; y1 q+ \ative initial history of androgen exposure, our! `, Y; I& Z$ ]) h; N% G9 j
biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
e1 H9 M' e: z. {4 s1 Veither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase
; F: ]" f+ d6 B; @* `deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-5 R( v4 f/ f i
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.
: h; o' [3 J) j; XThe diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
% `& e; h* {0 S8 ~5 B9 i o2 U7 N# \suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
+ j* a4 S2 Q# M" U5 cthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-& J) t) F% O4 ?$ e% v
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and4 P% Q5 `2 i" Y$ y j
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-- k' P/ v, S0 C N
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was7 w3 n# ^) @* R
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’3 i) L Q3 X* B) a. l+ J" M
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or: _: u+ J9 Z$ H& }
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
' Q/ A- z8 |, s9 n# `unprotected females through direct skin exposure.
: I' V& J" U7 PSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the! o( r* N9 y, r% {# _3 t
baseline value in those females who were exposed to
5 e% B$ [, O$ G5 Deven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
1 }2 @, L5 R) {6 _3 w& O) F/ `partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
3 O0 }! \9 e! ]4 r3 l1 ^, I, ^tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
1 q; S4 H. R2 aOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
. ^7 M3 a! \. I* j+ E8 swhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
1 Z2 O1 Y' \ Z1 xdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-4 U5 J- u$ l) d$ f. D
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more+ A7 ]. v4 k% x: i' T5 p
active in young children exposed to testosterone. W' Q9 H- G2 {, j
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-) F* h" V/ ~* y1 F! z* T- p7 a/ ~
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
# p$ `, t9 M( E$ O w" Lvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in: v# D& ~' {& Z: q* E
children results in an increase in growth velocity and# D8 ]) o& j- K8 j# Z
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
4 k: m0 h9 Z" t' FThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during
+ o) O' v' E \. a' k) ?early childhood on pubertal development and final
% X" [: r# \) @) t# @4 Xadult height are not fully known and always remain( }; T1 l) O8 L5 h2 P
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
! x' [* N/ |+ z( m' Cterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some/ t2 I# n+ J3 R$ K) N/ l5 P5 O' ^
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
" Y! o5 P( f2 d* j3 O! q+ ocessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation. O5 v9 V: E; F+ c( }
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9* W. ?7 [! i8 }* o. v7 x! g
There are conflicting reports and controversy
( N* Y: I0 o8 A$ W1 Fover the effect of early androgen exposure on adult) J# I( `# I; O
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal0 N0 E k+ t4 y/ G. d
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
' W# d' t+ {3 [& x* r3 Rulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
4 ^+ A, Y1 |8 }2 WSutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between& ~7 l* i p5 K* R1 o2 |! [: H9 a
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
$ B1 D0 e1 w+ c5 ?. ~& P( vpenile length in clinical studies.7 i) f1 q& Y& a& s
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
* p/ G" F1 e$ }" }1 t9 t3 Lgoing to experience any of the untoward effects from& u9 n& k1 y+ H' s
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because N7 J) o% ^) g5 r" g
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
+ y W1 B1 t K3 u9 zAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of
7 f' v; u- i- }# R" @4 Idiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at% {, w B# v9 A5 G2 ~
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
8 I8 I- C r5 J3 W$ D- D6 O9 Iheight will not be affected.$ I( b( j: M0 Y
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-
; D2 E9 T, v: ~# n% G0 uability of androgen products in our society may4 M1 O4 G6 N0 D0 M
indeed cause more virilization in male or female
2 |3 y. M: ~$ `children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-4 L- ]. m) j$ P' N I* \4 x7 W
gen products must be considered and specific ques-
5 }8 D. W' l5 _' T8 C) u, `$ |tioning about the use of a testosterone product or
9 X7 V4 N( I' Fgel should be asked of the family members during
4 x6 c: A; J9 ?5 Hthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-0 D8 B) q7 W" ~9 T1 B! R: {
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-8 n! q# s! ^% {) E9 ~3 w6 e" V
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by* H* d" Y5 R) P! |8 B r6 p6 W
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a$ _2 I8 I6 W+ ~4 x) U
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
6 \& P+ l/ n6 _0 p8 O; Sresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive+ ~2 i1 L3 m0 s+ R" l/ P
investigation. The primary care physician should be! @% y4 D' r5 L* d0 _
aware of this fact, because most of these children6 J: b& U! l8 b& E% j% W
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’: s1 l. d) `& _/ b" r4 Y
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a
g2 I3 L& u" g8 O h# j, X$ Swarning about the virilizing effect on a male or
+ ? @- B1 Y9 ^. pfemale child who might come in contact with some-
" U$ ]! p9 L- o4 k4 qone using any of these products.& q" p$ y# ^% a7 q3 ~* g+ n3 V* y
References
% |4 g0 G/ m9 R- a, k/ d1 }! `1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
9 M, q4 e6 B9 e( Sand puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
* a/ U$ \6 `1 B9 G" fEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
' }- ]3 q Z6 w5 P) M2002: 565-628.' t' ?2 K7 }$ ~, @. w; R( X3 C0 i
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
+ G( _6 {) s# G& j3 b- gpuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal: p9 m2 \! L8 O. A( j- J" @3 ^
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from4 f" v, e( w5 h, {" [) W; Q
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 543- A, M4 I" X0 f, c
areas: organic central precocious puberty. Acta Paediatr.- t- f( P! o+ X- u/ |- s
2001;90:751-756.
8 l- h$ R% b1 F- g3. Lee PA. Puberty and its disorders. In: Lifshitz F, ed.( }) V3 P9 \1 ~0 b, L! k
Pediatric Endocrinology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Marcel
/ K7 H: L( r- q( cDekker Inc; 2003:211-238.
: J* c0 p) `+ {4 N3 e( G4. Yu YM, Punyasavatsu N, Elder D, D’Ercole AJ. Sexual
5 _, v/ y, n" p/ Z/ Wdevelopment in a two-year-old boy induced by topical; L$ Y% r7 i0 o; e+ h
exposure to testosterone. Pediatrics. 1999;104:e23.
% p8 I- t9 T8 w4 J/ \" {5. Greulich WW, Pyle SI, eds. Radiographic Atlas of
0 u5 I: t H7 x* x- m1 \2 H/ ASkeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist. 2nd ed.
0 @' W; h/ v0 f/ Y, pStanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1959.3 l2 ]8 w; z' `: A4 _
6. Physicians’ Desk Reference. Androgel 1% testosterone,+ H" u# b: K; E
Unimed Pharmaceutical Inc. Montvale, NJ: Medical$ l0 `0 o2 w/ Z {; l4 ~
Economics Company, Inc; 2004:3239-3241.
* n, t5 w9 \( O( o3 K7. Klugo RC, Cerny JC. Response of micropenis to topical8 C, d# Q! P+ `, v0 C& t
testosterone and gonadotropin. J Urol. 1978;119:
5 `4 e. c# C3 ^" [5 {7 H667-668.
" N C+ A" [% R1 X8. Guthrie RD, Smith DW, Graham CB. Testosterone
9 q: j# x, n! W2 Etreatment for micropenis during early childhood. J Pediatr.+ P4 G* w. x& S+ S8 K9 y: K
1973;83:247-252.5 o/ i W9 B. ]0 L6 c, l6 s
9. Jacobs SC, Kaplan GW, Gittes RF. Topical testosterone
( k$ g8 ~, f6 G& ?8 Mtherapy for penile growth. Urol. 1975;6:708-710.
* d" w4 _9 }3 N, g$ m6 |7 |% S10. Husmann DA, Cain MP. Microphallus: eventual phallic. G3 ?$ g: k& W) J* n
size is dependent on the timing of androgen administra-
* t2 s2 U. _" V) ?" ]: x+ `tion. J Urol. 1994;152:734-739.! w* M# L' g0 U
11. McMahon DR, Kramer SA, Husmann DA. Micropenis:
( {1 Q; _9 d9 e9 X$ Y5 S; w4 @does early treatment with testosterone do more harm
, u8 r: x% |5 |than good? J Urol. 1995;154:825-829.. h" w0 l; L- y2 w9 G
12. Takane KK, George FW, Wilson JD. Androgen receptor
" p4 ^. O( k9 U7 Iof rat penis is down-regulated by androgen. Am J Physiol.# |; ~7 t5 e/ Q' ?
1990;258:E46-E50.- x) `' K7 K( E) _; q5 |
13. Sutherland RS, Kogan BA, Baskin LS, et al. The effect. w% X$ _ y7 i% p
of prepubertal androgen exposure on adult penile. ?& v( M1 R, ?( h
length. J Urol. 1996;156:783-787. |
|